Tripura BJP activists visit CPM ex-MP Sankar Prasad Datta to protest his Hanuman remark: ‘We’ll pray he gains knowledge’
Agartala, Tripura — Former MP and CPI(M) leader Sankar Prasad Datta recently sparked outrage in Tripura. His comment during a CITU event upset many BJP activists and religious supporters. The controversy centers around Datta’s remarks on Lord Hanuman’s image on public vehicles.
He reportedly described the image as “shondamarka,” a Bengali slang term. The phrase often implies a “bully-like” or “rough-looking” appearance. Many BJP leaders viewed this as an insult to the revered deity.
BJP’s Symbolic Visit Turns into Political Message
In a unique protest, BJP’s youth wing and Bajrang Dal visited Datta’s home in Agartala. Led by BJP leader Papiya Datta, they carried a framed image of Lord Hanuman and a Hanuman Chalisa. The group said they had come not to fight but to help Datta understand.
“We’re not here to argue. We brought the Hanuman Chalisa so he can learn and reflect. We’ll pray he gains knowledge,” said Papiya.
Outside his home, others burned effigies and shouted slogans. The protest remained largely peaceful, but police stood guard to prevent clashes.
BJP Demands Arrest of Former MP
Tripura BJP leaders called for legal action against Sankar Prasad Datta. They said his comment had hurt Hindu sentiments.
“Saying Lord Hanuman looks like a goonda is disrespectful. It’s not freedom of speech—it’s a direct attack on faith,” said BJYM president and MLA Sushanta Deb.
He accused the Left of using such comments to provoke reactions. “This isn’t the first time they’ve done this. But now, people won’t ignore it,” he added.
Datta Responds to Outrage
Sankar Prasad Datta denied any intention to hurt religious beliefs. Speaking to reporters, he clarified that his words were misunderstood.
“I have deep respect for Hanuman. I was speaking about how religious images are being commercialized. My aim wasn’t to insult anyone,” he said.
He also accused BJP of turning a minor issue into a political stunt. “This is just to distract people from real issues like inflation and job losses,” Datta claimed.
Religion and Politics Intertwine
This episode reignites a broader debate across India—how much freedom can public figures have when discussing religion? Indian laws allow free speech but also protect religious sentiments. When those two ideas clash, conflicts like this emerge.
Legal experts say proving religious intent is complex. “The court looks at the context. If the speech wasn’t targeted, it might not count as a criminal offense,” said legal analyst Preeti Sinha.
Tripura’s Tense Political Climate
Tripura’s political landscape has shifted since BJP ousted the CPI(M) government. Every small incident now becomes a bigger political statement.
The BJP used this issue to rally its religious voter base. CPI(M), meanwhile, claims this is a diversion tactic.
Observers believe religion and politics are now deeply linked in the state. Political rivals often turn minor controversies into full-blown narratives.
Public Voices Urge Calm
Some community leaders urged both parties to avoid escalating the issue. Religious leaders stressed that faith should unite, not divide.
“Hanuman symbolizes courage, wisdom, and service. Let’s not turn his image into a political tool,” said Tripura scholar Dr. Ranjit Debbarma.
Many citizens echoed that view. “Politicians should show restraint, especially when speaking about matters of faith,” said Shila Roy, a teacher from Agartala.
Conclusion: Balancing Faith and Free Speech
This controversy is not only about one comment—it reflects a larger issue. As religion and politics intertwine, even minor remarks can stir emotions.
Tripura now finds itself at a crossroads. Will political leaders choose dialogue over division? Will they use religion to unite or polarize?
For now, the protests have calmed. But the incident serves as a reminder. Public figures must speak with care, especially when faith is involved.
