Censor Board objection to Janaki v/s State of Kerala: Protagonist, named after Goddess Sita, questioned by man of another faith
Mumbai, July 10, 2025 — The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has raised objections to the upcoming Malayalam film Janaki v/s State of Kerala, citing concerns over the protagonist’s name and a courtroom scene that involves religious undertones.
The film features a woman named Janaki — a clear reference to Goddess Sita — who is cross-examined by a male lawyer from another faith. The CBFC believes this portrayal could spark communal tension or offend religious sentiments.
CBFC Cites Cultural Sensitivity
The filmmakers submitted the movie for certification last month. It follows a woman’s fight for justice after facing institutional failures. However, the Board objected to how the film portrays Janaki — a symbolic name — during a courtroom exchange that involves religion.
One CBFC official explained, “The concern is that it may be seen as setting up a religious conflict, especially considering the emotional and cultural weight of the name ‘Janaki.’”
Director Defends the Film’s Message
Director Anil Raman, known for socially driven films, defended his choices. He said the name was chosen to symbolize strength and endurance, not to provoke religious tensions.
“This isn’t about religion. It’s about a woman’s fight for justice against systemic bias,” Raman explained. He added that the courtroom exchange aims to reflect how harshly survivors are treated, regardless of their background.
Political and Public Reactions
The objections triggered a sharp public response. Some right-wing groups accused the filmmakers of disrespecting Hindu beliefs. On the other hand, free speech advocates criticized the CBFC for stifling artistic expression.
“Creative freedom is under threat,” said activist Kavita Krishnan. “If artists must consider religion before writing characters, storytelling itself becomes limited.”
Possible Changes or Delays
The CBFC has suggested two options — change the protagonist’s name or modify the courtroom sequence. The filmmakers are currently reviewing these recommendations. If needed, they may appeal the decision.
The film was set for release on August 15. However, that date could be pushed back depending on the outcome of talks with the Board.
Debate Over Artistic Freedom
This controversy has reignited the national debate on artistic freedom and the CBFC’s role. Critics say the Board should certify films — not censor them.
With growing attention, Janaki v/s State of Kerala has become more than a regional film. It now sits at the center of a larger conversation about gender, religion, and freedom of expression in India.dia.
