‘Dog babu’, red faces and an FIR: How did a canine end up on residential certificate in Patna?

In Patna, Bihar, a dog named “Dog Babu” received a residence certificate. This strange event sparked both laughter and serious concerns. How could a dog get an official government document with canine parents’ names? The incident exposed flaws in Bihar’s administrative system and raised questions about its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise.

The Incident: A Dog Gets a Residence Certificate

On July 24, 2025, Bihar’s RTPS (Right to Public Services) portal issued a residence certificate in Masaurhi. The certificate named “Dog Babu” as a resident of Mohalla Kaulichak, Ward No. 15. It humorously listed “Kutta Babu” and “Kutiya Devi” as the dog’s parents—Hindi slang for dog father and mother.

The certificate included a golden retriever’s photo and a digital signature from Revenue Officer Murari Chauhan. Digital signatures require secure government dongles, which made the case even stranger.

Residence certificates help people access welfare, education, and voting rights. So, errors here carry serious consequences.

What Went Wrong?

Patna’s District Magistrate, Thiyagarajan SM, canceled the certificate immediately and launched an investigation.

Officials found that the application used a woman’s Aadhaar card and her husband’s documents. The staff failed to match these documents against the dog’s photo. This key verification step was skipped.

Police filed an FIR against the applicant, computer operator, and issuing officer. The investigation aims to find out if someone intentionally tampered with the system or was simply negligent.

Officials also suspect misuse of the revenue officer’s digital signature. How it appeared on the dog’s certificate remains unclear.

Public and Political Reactions

Social media exploded with memes calling the dog “Dog Babu,” mocking the government’s mistake.

Political leader Yogendra Yadav criticized Bihar’s SIR process. He pointed out the irony: a dog’s certificate passes, but real Aadhaar cards often get rejected.

Opposition parties questioned the government’s credibility. They warned that such errors erode public trust in government records and elections.

Why Residence Certificates Matter

Residence certificates prove where a person lives. Citizens use them for scholarships, subsidies, and voter lists.

Allowing false information leads to misuse of benefits and electoral fraud. The “Dog Babu” case shows how weak verification harms the system.

Administrative Failures: Where It Broke Down

The RTPS portal aims to reduce delays and corruption in service delivery.

But officials at the RTPS center and revenue office failed to verify the photo against identity documents. This negligence let false data enter official records.

Relying only on digital signatures without strict checks also weakens security.

The FIR seeks to uncover if this was a deliberate act or a careless mistake.

Lessons to Learn

This incident teaches key lessons for public services:

  1. Strengthen Verification: Use automated photo matching and biometrics to reduce errors.
  2. Train Staff and Enforce Accountability: Train officials to verify identities. Penalize those who fail.
  3. Improve Security: Add multi-factor or biometric authentication for digital signatures.
  4. Be Transparent: Investigate openly and fix errors quickly to maintain public trust.

A Symbol of Larger Challenges

“Dog Babu” is more than a joke. It reveals broader challenges in digital governance.

Millions depend on accurate government documents for services. Small errors can cause big problems.

Technology can help but needs strong systems and human oversight.

Conclusion

“Dog Babu” embarrassed Bihar’s government and sparked a debate on accountability and digital services.

Canceling the certificate and filing an FIR are first steps to fix the problem.

Governments must improve verification, upgrade security, and train officials better.

They must prevent such mistakes that harm trust in governance.

While “Dog Babu” stays a humorous symbol, it reminds us of the need for accurate, transparent, and reliable government services.