DM asked to explain why he ‘did not cooperate’ during Speaker Om Birla’s visit to Mussoorie

The Uttarakhand government has asked the Dehradun District Magistrate (DM) to explain why he did not cooperate during Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla’s visit to Mussoorie. The issue has sparked debate over administrative protocol and how officials treat top constitutional leaders.

What Happened During the Visit?

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla visited Mussoorie last week. His schedule included events at the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration (LBSNAA) and meetings with local leaders and officials.

However, officials from Birla’s team raised concerns. They said the district administration didn’t provide proper support or follow protocol. The Speaker holds the fourth-highest constitutional post in India and is entitled to full administrative assistance during such visits.

Government Seeks Explanation from DM

A senior official said the government has issued a show-cause notice to the DM. The notice asks him to explain why he missed key events and failed to offer proper coordination. It also points out gaps in security, transport, and communication.

“It is a serious matter if a senior constitutional authority doesn’t receive due protocol,” said a state official.

The government wants the DM to submit a written explanation within a fixed timeframe.

DM May Cite Flood Duties

The DM has not released a public statement yet. But sources close to the administration said he was likely managing flood preparedness and emergency protocols due to heavy rains in the region.

An official from his office said:

“There was no intent to disrespect. The DM was occupied with critical work related to monsoon safety.”

The official response is expected soon.

Political Leaders React

The controversy has triggered mixed reactions. Some opposition leaders accused the ruling party of trying to strain the relationship between politicians and civil servants.

Congress leader Harish Rawat said:

“Such issues should be resolved internally. Public warnings can demoralize hardworking officers.”

Others believe that protocol is non-negotiable when constitutional authorities are involved.

Former IAS officer Anil Swarup noted:

“Balancing local duties with national-level visits is part of an officer’s role.”

Larger Questions About Bureaucracy

This isn’t the first time a senior officer has faced heat for skipping protocol. Similar cases have come up in other states too. Experts say this reflects growing tension between bureaucrats and politicians.

They suggest both sides need better communication. Poor coordination leads to bad headlines and disrupts public trust.

What Could Happen Next?

If the DM’s explanation satisfies the government, the matter may end with a warning. But if officials find his response weak, they could issue a memo or even transfer him.

Sources say the DM has a good record, so harsh action is unlikely. A formal apology or explanation may settle the issue.

Final Thoughts

Speaker Om Birla’s visit to Mussoorie was meant to be smooth. But the lack of coordination has sparked a governance debate. Officers must support constitutional leaders while also handling local emergencies. This incident reminds us that public service often demands both balance and precision.