Why everyone wants Raj Thackeray: MNS chief’s meeting with Fadnavis sparks Maharashtra poll buzz

In a state as politically layered as Maharashtra, even a casual meeting can ignite a political firestorm. That’s exactly what happened when Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis recently met Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray at a plush hotel in Bandra, Mumbai. While it was described as a “courtesy call,” political circles are abuzz with speculation—could this be the beginning of a new alliance? Or perhaps a repositioning of forces ahead of crucial civic polls?

Raj Thackeray, once sidelined in Maharashtra’s political mainstream, is suddenly in demand again. And the timing couldn’t be more strategic.


Fadnavis-Raj Meeting: Coincidence or Calculated Strategy?

The meeting between Fadnavis and Raj Thackeray took place shortly after the Lok Sabha elections, in which the BJP-Shiv Sena (Shinde faction) alliance underperformed compared to expectations. While the BJP continues to be a dominant force in the state, the cracks within the Mahayuti alliance are becoming more visible. Add to that the upcoming Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections—arguably one of the most high-stakes civic elections in India—and you have the perfect stage for political chess moves.

For the BJP, roping in Raj Thackeray could serve multiple purposes:

  • Splitting the Marathi vote that traditionally goes to the Shiv Sena (Uddhav faction)
  • Neutralizing the growing popularity of the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliance
  • Sending a message to Eknath Shinde, whose grip over the Shiv Sena name and symbol still doesn’t guarantee grassroots loyalty

Why Raj Thackeray Matters Again

Raj Thackeray’s political journey has been tumultuous. A fiery orator with a distinct ideological identity rooted in Marathi pride, he once threatened to replace Uddhav Thackeray as the true heir of Bal Thackeray’s legacy. But over time, the MNS struggled electorally, and Raj’s influence dwindled.

However, Raj Thackeray retains strong pockets of support in Mumbai, Thane, Pune, and Nashik—especially among the Marathi middle class. His speeches still go viral. His persona still resonates with many who feel disenchanted with both factions of the Shiv Sena.

In an age of coalition politics and wafer-thin margins, even a small but committed vote bank can tilt the scales. That’s why Raj Thackeray is no longer just a political relic—he’s a potential kingmaker.


The Civic Poll Battlefield

The BMC, with an annual budget larger than some Indian states, is a symbol of both power and prestige. It has been under Shiv Sena’s control for nearly three decades. Losing the BMC would not only be a political blow to the Sena (Uddhav faction), but also a symbolic loss of its dominance over Mumbai, the city that birthed its legacy.

For the BJP, gaining control over the BMC is about completing a trifecta—state government, central representation, and now the civic machinery of Mumbai. A tie-up with MNS could be a masterstroke to weaken the Shiv Sena (UBT) bastion.

On the other hand, a potential MNS-Shiv Sena (UBT) merger or alliance is also being whispered about. Uddhav Thackeray, in a recent statement, cryptically said that “the people want us to come together,” leading to further speculation. Could the Thackeray cousins reunite? If so, it would drastically change the dynamics of Maharashtra politics.


BJP’s Balancing Act

The BJP is currently managing a delicate alliance with the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena and Ajit Pawar’s NCP faction. But with civic polls approaching and Lok Sabha results not meeting expectations in Maharashtra, the party seems to be exploring fallback options.

Meeting Raj Thackeray allows the BJP to keep its options open:

  • It signals discontent with current partners, especially if they under-deliver.
  • It keeps the opposition on edge, unsure of who is aligning with whom.
  • And it courts the Marathi manoos vote, something the BJP has long struggled to capture organically.

Raj Thackeray’s Dilemma

While Raj may be enjoying his renewed relevance, he faces a tough choice. Should he align with the BJP, which could offer him a short-term electoral advantage? Or should he consider reuniting with Uddhav, banking on emotional appeal and a united Marathi identity?

Aligning with BJP might risk alienating some of his core voters, especially after his past criticism of the party’s policies. Yet, a tie-up could give him the push he needs to win back lost ground—especially in Mumbai and Pune.

On the other hand, a reunion with Uddhav could create a powerful Marathi-centric front. But trust between the cousins is still an issue, and seat-sharing negotiations would be tricky.


What Lies Ahead?

As Maharashtra heads toward pivotal civic elections, the political air is thick with possibilities. Raj Thackeray is once again at the center of speculation, not because he commands massive numbers, but because he can influence just enough to matter.

The BJP’s outreach to him is a strategic maneuver, whether or not it materializes into a formal alliance. The Shiv Sena (UBT) is watching closely, aware that even a few thousand votes here and there can change the outcome in BMC wards. And Raj himself must decide whether he wants to be a disruptor, a partner, or perhaps even a unifier.

One thing is clear: in Maharashtra’s evolving power game, Raj Thackeray is no longer just a footnote—he’s back in play.