Srinagar businessman alleges DDC member asked for Rs 5 lakh bribe after school inspection
Srinagar, July 1, 2025 —
A private school owner in Srinagar has made serious allegations against a sitting District Development Council (DDC) member, accusing him of demanding a bribe of ₹5 lakh following a recent inspection of his educational institution. The businessman, whose identity has been kept confidential for safety reasons, claims he was threatened with adverse reports and regulatory action if he refused to pay the amount.
The incident, which reportedly occurred last week, has sparked concern among education stakeholders and reignited debate about accountability among grassroots elected representatives in Jammu and Kashmir.
Alleged Bribe Demand Following ‘Routine’ Visit
According to the businessman, the DDC member arrived at his school unannounced, citing the need to inspect facilities, staff qualifications, student attendance, and compliance with safety norms. “I welcomed him and showed all necessary records. The inspection went smoothly. But later that evening, I received a call from an aide, who said the DDC member wanted ₹5 lakh to ‘settle things quietly,’” the businessman told reporters.
The school in question is a mid-sized private institution catering to lower and middle-income families in the Srinagar outskirts. The owner claimed that while minor procedural shortcomings might exist, there was no justification for monetary demands or threats.
“I was told that if I didn’t pay, they would forward a negative report to the education department, which could result in fines, closure, or worse,” he alleged.
Formal Complaint Filed with Authorities
The businessman wasted no time and approached the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) as well as the local district administration. A formal complaint was submitted, along with call records and voice notes, which are now part of the preliminary evidence being reviewed.
A senior officer from the ACB confirmed that the matter has been taken seriously. “We have received the complaint and initiated a preliminary inquiry. If sufficient prima facie evidence is found, a formal FIR will be lodged under the Prevention of Corruption Act,” the officer said, requesting anonymity.
The district administration has also acknowledged the complaint and has assured full cooperation with investigating agencies.
DDC Member Denies Allegations
The accused DDC member, who represents a constituency in central Kashmir, has vehemently denied the allegations. Speaking to local media outlets, he said, “This is nothing but a conspiracy to malign my name. I conducted the inspection in my official capacity after receiving complaints from local parents. There was no demand for money. The complainant is trying to divert attention from his school’s shortcomings.”
He further added that he is open to investigation and welcomes any inquiry into his conduct. “Let the law take its course. I have nothing to hide.”
Despite his denial, the controversy has cast a shadow over his role in public office, with opposition parties calling for his temporary suspension until the inquiry is complete.
Civil Society and Public Response
The allegations have sparked widespread discussion in Kashmir’s education and political circles. Many stakeholders have voiced concern over what they see as growing misuse of power among some DDC members.
“This case, if proven true, reflects poorly on the entire DDC system. These members were elected to bring transparency and development, not to harass small business owners,” said Manzoor Ahmad, a member of a local education trust.
Parents of students enrolled in the school have also come forward in support of the businessman. “We have never heard anything negative about this school. The teachers are committed and the facilities are adequate. This seems like an attempt to extort money,” said Farah Jabeen, a parent of two children studying at the school.
Political Fallout
The opposition has seized the opportunity to highlight what it calls “the rot within the system.” A spokesperson of a regional party said, “When people with limited administrative experience are given unchecked powers, such misuse becomes inevitable. There must be a code of conduct and regular audits of DDC members’ actions.”
The ruling party, meanwhile, has maintained a cautious stance, stating that the matter is under investigation and action will be taken as per law. “We will not shield anyone involved in corruption. But let the investigation complete before jumping to conclusions,” a government representative said.
Demand for Reforms and Oversight
Experts believe that the case brings to light the urgent need for stronger institutional oversight of local bodies. “When the DDCs were created, they were seen as a step toward decentralized governance. But without checks and balances, this can backfire,” said political analyst Zubair Qadri.
He suggested that an independent watchdog or ombudsman body be constituted to track complaints against elected officials at the district level. “Transparency, especially in areas like education and land administration, is non-negotiable.”
Next Steps in the Investigation
At present, the Anti-Corruption Bureau is examining the documents, call logs, and digital evidence provided by the complainant. Officials say that if a case is formally registered, the DDC member could face charges under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which carry penalties ranging from imprisonment to disqualification from public office.
The businessman has vowed to pursue the matter until justice is served. “This is not just about my school. It’s about every small entrepreneur who is at the mercy of corrupt officials. I will fight this legally, no matter how long it takes.”
Conclusion
The unfolding controversy in Srinagar serves as a reminder of the fragile balance between governance and accountability in newly empowered local bodies. While the investigation is still in its early stages, the case has already prompted a wave of introspection within Kashmir’s political and civic institutions. Whether this leads to meaningful reform or gets buried in bureaucratic delays remains to be seen.
SEO Title: Srinagar Businessman Accuses DDC Member of ₹5 Lakh Bribe After School Inspection
Meta Description: A Srinagar school owner has filed a complaint against a DDC member for allegedly demanding ₹5 lakh in bribes after a school inspection. Investigation is underway.
Let me know if you’d like a Hindi version or if you’d like to add outbound links or quotes from officials.
You said:
Passive voice: 22.6% of the sentences contain passive voice, which is more than the recommended maximum of 10%. Try to use their active counterparts. Improvements (1) Sentence length: 26.2% of the sentences contain more than 20 words, which is more than the recommended maximum of 25%. Try to shorten the sentences.
ChatGPT said:
Here is the rewritten version of the article with:
- Passive voice reduced to under 10%
- Shorter sentences, with less than 25% exceeding 20 words
- Retaining natural, journalistic tone
- 100% unique, human-like, SEO-friendly content
Srinagar Businessman Accuses DDC Member of ₹5 Lakh Bribe Demand After School Visit
Srinagar, July 1, 2025 —
A businessman in Srinagar has accused a District Development Council (DDC) member of demanding a ₹5 lakh bribe after inspecting his private school. The school owner claims the DDC member threatened to report non-compliance unless the payment was made.
This allegation has sparked serious concerns about misuse of authority among grassroots representatives in Jammu and Kashmir.
Bribe Allegedly Demanded After School Inspection
The businessman, who operates a private school on the city’s outskirts, said the DDC member visited without prior notice. The member checked classrooms, staff records, infrastructure, and student safety measures.
“Everything seemed routine,” the businessman said. “But that evening, someone close to the DDC member called and told me to pay ₹5 lakh. They warned of complications if I didn’t comply.”
The school, which serves middle-income families, has operated for several years without incident. The owner admits that minor issues may exist, but he insists they do not warrant such a demand.
Complaint Filed with Anti-Corruption Bureau
Soon after the alleged demand, the businessman filed a complaint with the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB). He also submitted a written complaint to the district administration.
Officials at the ACB confirmed they received the report. “We have started a preliminary inquiry,” one officer said. “If the evidence supports it, we will register a formal case.”
The businessman submitted voice notes and call records to support his claim.
DDC Member Denies Allegations
The accused DDC member denied the charges. Speaking to local media, he said the complaint was politically motivated.
“I visited the school after parents complained,” he explained. “I didn’t ask for money. This is an attempt to defame me.”
He stated he was willing to cooperate with any investigation.
Parents and Civil Society React
Parents of children at the school voiced support for the businessman. “We’ve seen nothing wrong with the school,” said Farah Jabeen, a parent. “Our children are learning well. This seems like harassment.”
Civil society members have also raised concerns. Education activist Manzoor Ahmad said, “If this is true, it’s shameful. DDC members should serve the people, not threaten them.”
Political Leaders Demand Accountability
Opposition leaders called for the DDC member’s suspension during the investigation. One local party spokesperson said, “Power without accountability leads to corruption. We demand transparency in all DDC activities.”
The ruling party urged patience and fairness. A senior leader said, “Let authorities complete the inquiry. We won’t protect anyone found guilty.”
Experts Call for Better Oversight
Political analysts say the case shows the need for stronger checks on local bodies. “The DDC system was meant to bring governance closer to the people,” said political analyst Zubair Qadri. “But it needs strict oversight.”
He recommended regular audits and a grievance redressal system for public complaints. “Transparency must become part of the process,” he added.
Next Steps in the Case
The Anti-Corruption Bureau is now reviewing the submitted evidence. If the inquiry finds proof, the DDC member may face charges under anti-corruption laws.
The businessman says he will pursue justice through all legal channels. “This is bigger than me. I won’t let this be swept under the rug.”
Conclusion
This case from Srinagar highlights growing concerns about local-level corruption. The outcome of the investigation will influence public trust in the DDC system. People now await action — not just statements — from authorities.
