Trump signs proclamation to suspend student visas at Harvard University

On June 4, 2025, former U.S. President Donald Trump signed a proclamation suspending new student visas for foreign nationals planning to enroll at Harvard University. The six-month suspension targets F, M, and J visas specifically for Harvard, marking a major escalation in the administration’s crackdown on international students at certain American universities. This move, directed solely at Harvard, has sparked intense debate about its legal, educational, and diplomatic consequences.

What Does the Proclamation Entail?

The proclamation halts the issuance of new visas to prospective Harvard students. It covers academic (F visas), vocational (M visas), and exchange visitor (J visas) categories. Additionally, the U.S. State Department must review current international students at Harvard for possible visa revocations. The criteria for revocation focus on students suspected of engaging in illegal or harmful activities against U.S. interests.

Notably, the suspension applies only to Harvard University. Other universities participating in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) remain unaffected. Exceptions exist if allowing entry is deemed in the national interest.

Administration’s Justification: National Security Concerns

The Trump administration justified this action on national security grounds. Officials alleged that Harvard failed to properly report incidents involving foreign students that could threaten security. They also pointed to the university’s extensive financial ties with foreign entities, particularly in China. Concerns about Harvard’s handling of campus safety and its response to antisemitic incidents further fueled the administration’s decision.

The White House framed the proclamation as a necessary step to safeguard U.S. interests and enforce accountability among universities for governance and security lapses.

Harvard University’s Response

Harvard University immediately condemned the proclamation. University leaders called it an illegal, politically motivated retaliation that violates First Amendment rights. They argued the decision undermines academic freedom and the institution’s commitment to diversity.

Harvard also pledged to protect its international students and announced plans to challenge the proclamation in federal court. The university stressed that international students enrich academic life and drive innovation and cultural exchange.

Impact on International Students and the Academic Community

The visa suspension affects thousands of students, faculty, and the wider academic community. International students make up a significant portion of Harvard’s population, bringing unique perspectives and supporting vital research.

Prospective students face uncertainty regarding their ability to begin studies this year. Current students worry about visa revocation and potential interruptions in their academic progress.

Other U.S. universities have taken notice. Many rely heavily on international students for both diversity and funding. Experts warn this targeted suspension might set a precedent, damaging the global reputation of American higher education.

Broader Political and Diplomatic Context

This action fits within a broader pattern of tension between the Trump administration and universities hosting many international students, especially those from China and India. These disputes revolve around concerns about intellectual property theft, espionage, and foreign influence on campuses.

Diplomatically, the move has strained relations between the U.S. and key countries that send students to Harvard. International governments worry that visa restrictions could prompt retaliatory actions, weakening academic cooperation worldwide.

Legal and Constitutional Questions

Legal experts debate whether the federal government has the authority to single out one university with such restrictions. Some suggest the proclamation could face legal challenges based on discrimination and violations of due process rights.

Critics argue the national security justification lacks transparency and sufficient evidence. They also caution against potential abuses in revoking visas from current students without clear, fair criteria.

The Future of International Student Policies in the U.S.

The proclamation highlights the challenge of balancing national security with academic openness and global collaboration. Protecting the country remains vital, but so does maintaining access to international talent that fuels innovation and economic growth.

As Harvard prepares legal challenges, discussions about the role of international students in U.S. education will intensify. The outcome may reshape policies affecting American higher education for years ahead.